Canada's Court: Oral Arguments from the SCC
Kanaaldetails
Canada's Court: Oral Arguments from the SCC
Canada’s Court is the first podcast to highlight select oral hearings from The Supreme Court of Canada. Presented by the Criminal Lawyers’ Association and available on all major podcast platforms. Visit podcast.criminallawyers.ca for more information. A full webcast version of the oral arguments fea...
Recente afleveringen
85 afleveringen
Episode 7: R. v. Chicoine-Joubert (French)
Au terme d’un procès devant jury présidé par le juge Blanchard de la Cour supérieure, l’appelant, Maxime Chicoine-Joubert, a été déclaré coupable d’un...
Episode 6: R. v. Stuart Michael George Sabiston
During a search incident to arrest, Mr. Sabiston told police that he had a firearm in his backpack. The officers subsequently seized a loaded prohibit...
Episode 5: R. c. Varennes (French)
En 2015, l’appelant est accusé du meurtre au deuxième degré de sa conjointe. Avant son procès, une juge de la Cour supérieure du Québec accueille sa r...
Episode 4: R. v. Stevenson
Years after a restaurant was robbed by two masked assailants, an unsavoury witness, or rather, a witness that required a Vetrovec caution at trial, ca...
Episode 3: R. v. Jennifer Pan
Hello, my name is Monica Bharadwaj and I am a criminal defence lawyer practicing in downtown Toronto. This is the case of R. v. Jennifer Pan and all. ...
Episode 2: R. v. Bharwani
This case is about the Taylor test for fitness to stand trial and the separate test for not criminally responsible by reason of mental disorder.
...
Episode 1: R. v. John Howard Society
When an inmate in a provincial correctional facility in Saskatchewan is charged with a disciplinary offence, the governing legislation requires the in...
Episode 9: R. v. T.J.F.
The accused was alleged to have committed human trafficking and related offences between 2006-2011. At trial, the trial judge did not accept the compl...
Episode 8: R. v. Campbell
Mr. Campbell was convicted of trafficking, and heroine and Fentanyl, and possessing those drugs for the purpose of trafficking them, contrary to the C...
Episode 7: R. c. Boudreau (French)
Bonjour et bienvenue à un autre épisode de Canada’s Court présenté par l’Association des avocats de la défense. Je m’appelle Jade Roberts et je suis u...
Episode 6: R. v. Flemmings
This is a bonus episode that features oral argument for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. The applicants, Mr. Flemmings and Mr. Agpoon, received a...
Episode 5: R. v. Hodgson
The Appellant, Daniel Hodgson, was charged with second-degree murder following a death at a house party. The victim, a large man, had become aggressiv...
Episode 4: R. c. Archambault (French)
Bonjour et bienvenue à un autre épisode de Canada’s Court présenté par l’Association des avocats de la défense. Je m’appelle Jade Roberts et je suis u...
Episode 3: R. v. Ramos
The appellants, Emanuel Lozada and Victor Ramos, were both charged with manslaughter. They, along with one another male, were involved in two fights,...
Episode 2: R. c Landry (French)
Bonjour et bienvenue à un autre épisode de Canada’s Court présenté par l’Association des avocats de la défense. Je m’appelle Jade Roberts et je suis u...
Episode 1: R. v. Vu
Private D.T. Vu was charged with sexual assault. It was alleged that he performed a sex act on the complainant who was incapable of consenting to the...
Episode 6: R. c Franck Yvan Tayo Tompouba (French)
Bonjour et bienvenue à un autre épisode de Canada’s Court présenté par l’Association des avocats de la défense. Je m’appelle Jade Roberts et je suis u...
Episode 5: R c Sergeant S.R. Proulx, et al. (FRENCH)
Bonjour et bienvenue à un autre épisode de Canada’s Court présenté par l’Association des avocats de la défense. Je m’appelle Jade Roberts et je suis u...
Episode 4: Derrick Michael Lawlor v R
In the case of Derrick Michael Lawlor v The King, Mr. Lawlor, the appellant, appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada as of right from the Court of App...
Episode 3: R. v. Lindsay
CASE SUMMARY- TREVOR LINDSAY V. HIS MAJESTY THE KING
At what point should a police officer lose the protection offered by section 25 of...
Episode 2: R. v. Edwards, et. al.
The appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada originates from Court Martial Appeal Court (CMAC). Prior to the appeal being filed, multiple decisions came...
Episode 10: R. v. Charles (French)
Bonjour et bienvenue à un autre épisode de Canada’s Court présenté par l’Association des avocats de la défence. Je m’appelle Salematou Camara et je su...
Episode 8: R. v. Metzger
Mr. Metzger was convicted of two counts of robbery, breaking and entering to steal a firearm, and disguise with intent in relation to 2017 home invasi...
Episode 7: R. v. H.V. (French)
Il y a une ordonnance de non-publication dans le dossier
L’intimé, H.V., a plaidé coupable à une infraction de leurre, poursuivie par voie somma...
Episode 6: R. v. Chatillion (French)
M. Chatillon a été déclaré coupable d’un chef d’agression sexuelle sur une enfant. Cette condamnation a été principalement basée sur des aveux qu’il a...
Episode 5: Hay v. His Majesty the King
Mr. Hay and the complainant met online and had been dating for approximately one month before the alleged sexual assault, involving unconsensual anal...
Episode 4: R. c Marchand (French)
(ORDONNANCE DE NON PUBLICATION DANS LE DOSSIER)
L’intimé a plaidé coupable à une accusation de contacts sexuels commis sur une mineure âgée de m...
Episode 3: R. v. S.S
Mr. S.S. was charged with sexual assault and sexual interference against his niece E.B who was 6-8 years old at the time of the allegations.
The...
Episode 2: R v Bykovets
This case comes before the Court as of right following a dissent in the Alberta Court of Appeal.
In September of 2017, police investigated the...
Episode 1: R v Abdullahi
In 2012, two young Somali men were murdered in what was perceived by Police and the media to be street level gang violence. Toronto Police led a join...
Episode 7: R v Vernelus (French)
La Cour d’appel du Québec, rejette l’appel de l’accusé basé sur le caractère déraisonnable du verdict.
Siégeant en appel, la Cour d’appel du Qué...
Episode 6: R v David Edward Furey
On January 7, 2020, David Edward Fury entered the home of Paul and Chris Worrall on two occasions, culminating in physical confrontations between the...
Episode 5: Basque v His Majesty the King
In 2017, the Appellant, Jennifer Basque, was charged with operating a motor vehicle while having a blood alcohol level greater than 80 milligrams per...
Episode 4: R. v. Downes
Mr. Downes was convicted of two counts of voyeurism contrary to s. 162(1)(a) of the Criminal Code after being found to have surreptitiously taken phot...
Episode 3: R. v. Johnston
The respondents, Matthew James Johnston and Cody Rae Haevischer, were convicted at of six counts of first-degree murder and one count of conspiracy t...
Episode 2: R. v. McColman
At around 12:30 a.m. on March 26, 2016, police on general patrol in the area of the Thessalon Frist Nation in Northern Ontario saw a utility terrain v...
Episode 1: R. v. Breault (French)
L’intimé M. Breault a refusé à plusieurs reprises de fournir un échantillon d’haleine à un agent de la paix qui lui ordonne de le faire, alors qu’il n...
Episode 8: R v Nahanee (Bonus)
There is a section 486.4 publication ban involving this matter.
Mr. Kerry Alexander Nahanee pleaded guilty to two counts of sexual assault. The...
Episode 7: R v Hilbach (Bonus)
On June 9, 2017, a 19-year-old Mr. Ocean Storm Hilbach covered his face with his shirt and entered an Edmonton Convenience store with a sawed-off rifl...
Episode 6: McGregor v R
This case deals with the application of the Charter to Canadian armed forces members stationed abroad. The Appellant, Corporal McGregor, was a Canadia...